What would it take for to ensure that every service-learning practitioner possesses the opportunity to engage in
effective professional learning every day?
The Providers’ Network Professional Development Guidelines paint a detailed and practical three-part picture of
what is needed.
The National Staff Development Council created a well-known set of professional development standards for any
subject (available at www.nsdc.org). Their work divides standards into three categories: Context Standards,
Process Standards, and Content Standards.
Following their example, the Providers’ Network seeks to create a set of professional development standards
(which we call guidelines) designed exclusively for service-learning. We will use their broad framework but
address each guideline to specific requirements of fostering quality service-learning professional development.
While there are multiple factors that influence the success or failure of professional development, we agree
with the National Staff Development Council that there are three main types of variables.
Context Guidelines: The “When,” “Where,” and “Why” of Professional Development
“Context characteristics address the organization and the nature of the system in which change will occur.
They are the underpinnings–the system foundation—upon which professional development occurs.” Without the right
context, the likely impact of any service-learning professional development will be sporadic and weak.
Process Guidelines: The “How” of Professional Development
Process variables refer to how professional development activities are planned, organized, delivered, and
followed up. They reflect what we know about good facilitation and how people learn new skills and knowledge.
Content Guidelines: The “What” of Professional Development
Content characteristics are primarily the new knowledge, skills, and understanding that are the foundation for
quality service-learning practice. The eight standards for quality service-learning practice form the core of
content variables.
Adapted from: Colorado Statewide Systemic Initiative for Mathematics and Science (1997). Professional
Development Criteria: “A Study Guide for Effective Professional Development.
Inviting Your Feedback: We will upload the three different sections in stages. Now available is the
Context Guidelines. We are inviting feedback from the service-learning field through August, 2010. Tell us what
you like about the Guidelines and how they can be made even better and more useful. Offer Feedback.
Using the Guidelines
| Advocate |
Educate key gatekeepers about what is necessary for service-learning professional development.
|
| Plan |
Use the Guidelines to help plan professional development.
|
| Assess |
Self-assess a current professional development program. |
| Educate |
Jointly explore and debate best practices in service-learning professional development. |
| Field-Building | Foster a high expectation for quality professional development within the field. |
| Grant RFP | Provide criteria for grant applications. |
| Evaluate | Gather feedback on program quality and areas for improvement. |
Return to Top
Reflection Questions Before You Read the Guidelines
Think of a professional development initiative where you felt most alive, most stretched, most excited by what you
were learning. Where were you, what was the content and characteristics that made this experience stand out among
so many?
What are the current strengths of service-learning professional development in your school/ organization?
What is it that you already do well?
If you wanted to improve the quality of professional development in our school/ organization,
what would be three wishes that you have?
Return to Top
Adding Resources
If you have know of other resources that would be helpful, there is a place at the end of each Guideline to
add to the references already listed.
Return to Top
Editors/Authors
Overall Editors: Drs. James and Pamela Toole of Compass Institute and the University of Minnesota
-
Context Guideline Editors: Jennifer Piscatelli, Terry Pickeral, and Lisa Guilfoile, National Center for
Learning and Citizenship, Education Commission of the States
- Process Guideline Editors: Drs. James and Pamela Toole
- Content Guideline Editors: Dr. Shelley Billig, RMC Research Denver
Return to Top
Advisory Group
Context Guidelines: How do we build a supportive environment of leadership, policy and resources to support
service-learning professional development? (11 Members)
Context characteristics address the environment (internally and externally) in which service-learning
professional development will occur. It identifies the key elements required for professional development to be
successful.
| Susan Abravanel |
Youth Service America, Washington, D.C. |
| Lisa Bardwell |
FrontRange Earth Force, Denver, Colorado |
| Lois Brewer |
Seattle Schools, Washington |
| July Conway |
Waseca School District, Minnesota |
| Larry Fletch |
Washington State |
| Kim Huseman |
Quest High School, Texas |
| Lynne Kavash |
Moorhead Schools, Minnesota |
| Cassie Landry |
Louisiana Serve Commission |
| Terry Pickeral (Editor) |
National Center for Learning and Citizenship, Colorado |
| Yolanda Reid |
Georgia Middle School Guidance Counselor |
| Matt Robinson |
Kids Consortium, Maine |
Process Guidelines: How do you design, deliver, and evaluate service-learning professional development?
(18 Members)
Process variables refer to how professional development activities are planned, organized, delivered, and
followed up. They reflect what we know about good facilitation and how people learn new skills and knowledge.
| Connie Abert |
University of Wisconsin Extension Services |
| Julie Rogers Bascom |
Edina Public Schools, Minnesota |
| John Durand |
Galt JUESD, California |
| Jon Erwin |
Smart Character Choices, Michigan |
| Erin Hudson |
Calaveras County Office of Education, California |
| Tracy Harkins |
KIDS Consortium, Maine |
| Anne Larson |
Moorhead Schools, Minnesota |
| Shannon Malone |
Youth Service California |
| Rachel Meytin |
PANIM, Maryland |
| Beth Nickle |
Bailey High School, Missouri |
| Amy O’Neill |
Pennsylvania K-12 |
| Frances Shani Parker |
National Youth Leadership Council, Michigan |
| Sandi Ryack-Bell |
The Dunn Foundation, Rhode Island |
| Lauren Satterlee |
Youth Venture, Minnesota |
| Jan Schuster |
Missouri Regional Center |
| Ana Solar |
Earth Force, Colorado |
| James and Pamela Toole (Co-Editors) |
Compass Institute & University of Minnesota |
Content Guidelines: What is it service-learning practitioners should know and be able to do? (17 Members)
Content characteristics address the new knowledge, skills, and understanding that are the foundation for quality service-learning practice. The eight standards for quality service-learning practice form the core of content variables.
| Shelley Billig (Editor) |
RMC Research, Denver |
| Joe Follman |
Florida Department of Education |
| Carolyn C. Foxx |
North Carolina Department of Public Instruction |
| Anne French |
North Adams, MA Public Schools |
| Barbara Gasdaglis |
The Brown Foundation, Louisiana |
| DD Gass |
CampFire USA, Missouri |
| Shannon Malovrh |
East Range Partnership, Virginia |
| Philip McFarland |
Wildwood School, Los Angeles |
| Fran Rudoff |
KIDS Consortium, Maine |
| Jennifer Shiner |
Mandel Center for Nonprofit Organizations, Indiana |
| Liberty Smith |
National Service-Learning Clearninghouse |
| Nicholas Stahelin |
Peace Corps Fellows Program, Teachers College, New York City |
| Michael Slavkin |
University of Southern Indiana |
| Diane Vance |
Smart Character Choices, Michigan |
| Veray Wickham |
San Joaquin Co. Office of Ed., California |
| Kelly Williams |
Georgia Public Schools |
| Barb Witteman |
Concordia College, Minnesota |
Return to Top
|
|
|